• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

intellexpro

Intellectual Property Protection & Monetization

  • Home
  • Services
    • Trademark
    • Copyright
    • Patent
    • Software & Database
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

New changes proposed by the SIPO to the China Patent Law

The State Intellectual Property Office has proposed to modify the China Patent Law and issued a draft soliciting public comment on April 1, 2015. The deadline for submitting comments is April 30, 2015 and by that time, the SIPO will submit the draft to the National Congress Standing Committee to consider.

Now let’s look at the major changes to the Patent Law from the perspective of the SIPO.

New Service Invention Definition and Regulation

The proposed draft seems to tip the balance towards the inventor. In the current Patent Law, the technology, invented by an inventor employee who majorly harnesses his employer’s resources, belongs to the employer. In the proposed draft, the inventor employee can negotiate with the employer and the technology resulted from harnessing majorly employer’s resources belongs to the employee in default.

Also, in the draft, if the service invention has been applied for patent, the employer should compensate the employee. The SIPO generally codified the provisions of the current Implementing Regulation of China Patent Law.

Patent Owner Cannot Commit Monopoly Unreasonably

In light of the Qualcomm case, the new proposed draft commands that the patent must conduct its business in bone fide fashion and cannot use its patent to monopolize the market unreasonably. It is highly likely in the near future the government will enforce compulsory license for public interest and social benefit.

The Patent Reexamination Board Can Review Patent on Other Grounds not Asserted by Invalidation Petitioner

The Patent Reexamination Board (PRB), when reviewing the invalidation request, if necessary, can voluntarily review the patent in question for other reasons not asserted by the invalidation petitioner and check whether the patent complies with other rules under the China Patent Law. This might give much power to the PRB, and is very unlikely to pass in the official draft.

Defendant Should Voluntarily Submit Accounting Book in Litigation

The proposed draft requests the defendant in infringement litigation to submit accounting books relating to the infringing goods if the plaintiff cannot produce evidence of damages and the accounting books are in the defendant’s hands. This will shake some burden of the plaintiff to prove damages.

Administrative Measures are More Tougher

Not only the cap of administrative penalties is lifted from RMB 200,000 to 250,000, but the Administrative Organs, meaning the provincial or prefecture offices of SIPO can order to destroy the molds and machines, and confiscate infringing goods. This proposed change will greatly enhance the efficiency of administrative enforcement.

Statutory Damages can be Multiplied

Currently the statutory damages are capped at RMB 1,000,000. The proposed draft allows the judges to multiply the statutory amount up to three times considering the extent of infringing activities, which means the statutory damages can be as high as RMB 3,000,000.

New Rules on Internet Secondary Infringer

Under the proposed draft, if an internet service provider, such as e-commerce platform, knows or should have known the existence of patent infringement and does not take any remedial actions such as removing infringing content in time, such internet service provider will be jointly liable for patent infringement.

If the internet service provider does not know the infringement but does not take action in time after being notified, such internet service provider will be liable for any increased loss suffered by the patent holder.

New License Program administered by SIPO

If a patent holder wishes to license the patent to the public and specifies the license fee, the patent holder may send a notice of the announcement to the SIPO. Any individual or company who wants to practice the patent may need to serve a notice to the SIPO and pay the license fee according to the announcement.

Conclusion

The proposed draft introduces many new features, but other contents have not been modified dramatically. We will need to wait for the final draft and see if any major changes will take place later.

If you have any questions or intend to enforce your IPR in China, feel free to fill out the form or contact us.

Filed Under: IP development, Law and cases, Patent, Uncategorized Tagged With: China Patent, proposed draft, SIPO

Previous Post: « Small steps to prevent trademark disasters in China
Next Post: Service Invention Regulation draft published for comment in China »

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Copyright
  • Customs IPR Protection
  • Dispute resolution
  • Domain name
  • IP development
  • IPR enforcement
  • IT law
  • Law and cases
  • Patent
  • Trademark
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • Proposed Changes to the China Trademark Law in 2023
  • Trademark Use Evidence from the China Trademark Office’s perspective
  • How to get back your squatted .cn domain name in China
  • China Will Build Database of Name Lists on Suspects of Bad-Faith Registration
  • Primer on China trademark law and practice

Archives

  • June 2023
  • August 2018
  • February 2018
  • September 2017
  • March 2017
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015

Copyright © 2014 -2024 · Zhilai IP Law Office


We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in .

Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.