• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

intellexpro

Intellectual Property Protection & Monetization

  • Home
  • Services
    • Trademark
    • Copyright
    • Patent
    • Software & Database
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

China Customs seizures of IPR infringing goods skyrocket in 2014 demonstrating the importance of Customs IPR recordation

China Customs agency has released a summary of its IP enforcement efforts in the year 2014, which contains some useful data on the overall shape and scale of customs seizures. The report was released on May 8, 2015. The numbers are analyzed and demonstrated below. It reveals the importance of registering your IPR, particularly trademark and copyright, with the customs authorities in China.

According to the report, China Customs through its local authorities suspended clearance of over 27,008 shipments in 2014, and detailed almost 23,860 of those on suspicion of IP infringement. Most notably, 99.5% of the number of goods seized were to be exported. This represents a 17% increase from 2013. And those shipments were bigger on average in terms of volume, with the number of detained goods rising by 21.09% to nearly 92 million pieces.

Nearly 99.9% of actions were carried out on an ex officio basis, which means that the Customs take proactive roles. To achieve this end, most importantly, those IPR holders have already registered their IPR with the China Customs so that it has the basis for checking whether a particular shipment of goods infringes the IPR. In addition, education efforts targeted at customs officers, so that they can identify suspect goods, also remain a top priority for IPR owners. The report specifically mentions that local Customs bureaus such as Shanghai, Ningbo, and Nanjing invited representatives from Quality Brands Protection Committee member companies to conduct training sessions, which clearly shows that China customs are willing to welcome input from IPR holders.

As for types of IPR, seizures based on a trademark rights accounted for the vast majority of Customs actions – 96.86%. Surprisingly, patents come next, at 1.94%, while copyright infringing goods made up 1.20%. This is a shift from a previous situation where copyright came in second place. In 2012, the copyright was taking up almost 4% while patent was only 0.38%. A possible explanation is that design patent is becoming an increasingly popular way to enforce IPR. Another reason is that copyright holder may find it a bit difficult to register copyright in the first place let alone recording copyright at the China Customs.

In terms of breakdown based on types of goods, tobacco tops the chart with 44.03% in terms of the number of goods detained. The second place was taken by some unidentified goods. Other goods in the top list include cosmetic products, clothes, metal hardware, shoes, and auto parts. In short, most of the infringing goods are consumer goods.

Dripping down to nationality of IPR holders with the largest number of enforced IPRs, US comes in the first place. US companies are also topping the list of case values of the detained infringing goods. You may get a sense of what are the top IPR holders whose IPRs were enforced in China Customs from the chart below.

In summary, China Customs has become a powerful vehicle for enforcing IPR in China, which can easily stop infringing goods from exporting out of China. You may read a copy of Chinese version of the whole report here.

Country

Number of IPRs

Number of goods

Case value

US

2,266

13,850,107

78,962,480

France

863

2,216,955

7,297,611

Germany

711

1,992,121

21,622,243

China

514

11,961,097

74,243,420

Switzerland

491

43,031,351

22,630,365

Japan

467

9,534,357

28,860,810

S. Korea

423

1,304,409

9,400,629

Italy

421

672,241

5,986,960

UK

237

1,126,165

9,432,963

Netherlands

162

967,976

5,442,875

Filed Under: Copyright, Customs IPR Protection, IPR enforcement, Trademark, Uncategorized Tagged With: customs copyright recordation, customs ipr, customs trademark recordation, trademark

Previous Post: « How to resolve a .cn domain squatting dispute in China
Next Post: The reasons and steps of registering your trademark in China »

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Copyright
  • Customs IPR Protection
  • Dispute resolution
  • Domain name
  • IP development
  • IPR enforcement
  • IT law
  • Law and cases
  • Patent
  • Trademark
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • Proposed Changes to the China Trademark Law in 2023
  • Trademark Use Evidence from the China Trademark Office’s perspective
  • How to get back your squatted .cn domain name in China
  • China Will Build Database of Name Lists on Suspects of Bad-Faith Registration
  • Primer on China trademark law and practice

Archives

  • June 2023
  • August 2018
  • February 2018
  • September 2017
  • March 2017
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015

Copyright © 2014 -2024 · Zhilai IP Law Office


We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in .

Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.